论文部分内容阅读
2011年11月21日,广东省东莞市中级人民法院(以下简称“东莞中院”)对广东欧珀移动通信有限公司(以下简称“欧珀公司”)诉深圳市星宝通电子科技有限公司(以下简称“星宝通公司”)、“OCPO”销售商——郑关笑侵犯商标专用权纠纷案作出了一审判决:东莞中院判令被告星宝通公司和“OCPO”销售商郑关笑立即停止侵害原告欧珀公司涉案的第4571222号商标专用权;判令星宝通公司赔偿欧珀公司经济损失共计260万元。由此,一场由“OCPO”和“OPPO”一个字母之差引发的商标纠纷最终落下了帷幕。
On November 21, 2011, Dongguan Intermediate People’s Court of Guangdong Province (hereinafter referred to as “Dongguan Intermediate Court”) v. Guangdong Opal Mobile Communication Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Opal Company”) v. Shenzhen Star Po Electronic Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Star Treasure Company ”), “OCPO ” seller - Zheng Guoxie trademark infringement case made the first instance verdict: Dongguan Intermediate People’s Court ordered the prosecutor Via Star And “OCPO” seller Zheng Guanxiao immediately stopped infringing on the plaintiff Opal Inc. No. 4571222 trademark exclusive right; decree Star Treasure Company compensation Opal lost a total of 2.6 million yuan in economic losses. As a result, a trademark dispute between “OCPO” and “OPPO” led to the end of the trademark dispute came to an end.