论文部分内容阅读
邓小秋在《“二次花雅之争”浅说》(载《电视与戏剧》1987年第十期)一文中说,从“会演戏”与“叫座戏”的比较,使大家联想到当年的“雅部”与“花部”。“二次花雅之争”之说,也就应运而生。不恰当地强调“政治第一”、思想性强的弊病,是“会演戏”不受群众喜爱的主要原因。事买证明,“会演戏”实际上一直是在走着当年“雅部”的道路。至于会演以后,是否仍能正常上演,早就弃之不顾。相反,拥有广大观众的“叫座剧目”,以强烈的人民性取胜,
Deng Xiaoqiu said in the article “Shallow talk about the dispute of the second HuaYa” (Tertiary TV and Drama 1987 Tenth Issue) that from the comparison of “acting” and “calling play”, we remind everyone of “Ya Department ”and“ Department of flowers. ” “The second flower elegant dispute” that also came into being. Inappropriate emphasis on the “political first” and the ideological weaknesses, is the main reason why “acting” is not favored by the masses. Proof of affair, “acting” actually has been walking in the same year “Ya department” road. As for the performance will be able to staged, it has long been abandoned regardless. On the contrary, the “popular opera” with a large audience wins with strong humanity,