论文部分内容阅读
目的:探析乡镇卫生院妇科盆腔炎患者临床治疗的效果。方法:将2015年6月至2017年6月期间本乡镇卫生院接收的妇科盆腔炎患者60例纳为本组参研的样本,遵循随机数字表法均分成参照组与干预组,前者实施常规药物治疗;后者实施综合治疗。经统计学分析比较两组疗效及不良反应的优劣。结果:干预组治疗后的总有效率93.3%与参照组70%相比差异明显,P<0.05,有统计学意义;参照组不良反应发生率33.3%高于干预组6.7%,构成统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在乡镇卫生院妇科盆腔炎治疗中采取综合治疗措施的效果确切,安全可靠,值得推广。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of gynecological pelvic inflammatory disease in township hospitals. Methods: From June 2015 to June 2017, 60 cases of gynecologic pelvic inflammatory disease received by the township hospitals were included in this study sample, followed by random number table were divided into reference group and intervention group, the former implementation of conventional Drug treatment; the latter implementation of comprehensive treatment. The statistical analysis of the two groups efficacy and adverse reaction of the pros and cons. Results: The total effective rate 93.3% in the intervention group was significantly different from the reference group 70%, P <0.05, statistically significant; the incidence of adverse reactions in the reference group 33.3% higher than the intervention group 6.7%, constituting a statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: The comprehensive treatment of gynecologic pelvic inflammatory disease in township hospitals is effective, safe and reliable and worthy of promotion.