论文部分内容阅读
一、读者揭发上海财经大学吴艳鹏同志:《财会通讯》1989年第3期发表广西高级人民法院农天从《试论会计与经济效益的“血缘”关系》一文,是全文抄袭西南财经大学教授毛伯林、肖德愚两同志发表在《会计研究》1984年第1期上的论文《试论会计与经济效益的“血缘”关系》。农文从大标题、小标题、主要结构、层次、语言全文照抄,只是将毛伯林、肖德愚两同志原文内容略加压缩,堪称“高级缩微复印”。记得《会计研究》1988年第5期上曾揭露过一起剽窃行为,但农天从的这种剽窃方法相比之下是有过之而无不及,令人瞠目,同时也为《财会通讯》被这种明目张胆的剽窃行为所践踏,而感遗憾。为维护《财会通讯》声誉,树立良好的学术研究风气,有必要揭露农天从欺骗读者、博
First, the reader exposed Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Comrade Wu Yanpeng: “Accounting Newsletter” 1989 the third period published Guangxi Higher People’s Court from the “trial of accounting and economic benefits” blood “relationship” one article is the full plagiarism Southwest University of Finance Professor Mao Berlin , Xiao Deyu two comrades published in “Accounting Research” 1984 the first issue of the paper “on the relationship between accounting and economic benefits” blood. Agricultural texts were copied from headlines, subheadings, main structures, levels and languages to full texts. Only the contents of the original contents of Comrade Mao Zelin and Xiao Deyu were slightly compressed, making them “advanced microfilm copying.” I remember “Accounting Research” No. 5 of 1988, had disclosed a plagiarism, but this method of plagiarism from agriculture compared to nothing more than impressive, but also for the “Accounting Newsletter” It is regrettable to be trampled by this blatant plagiarism. In order to maintain the prestige of “Accounting Association” and establish a good academic research ethos, it is necessary to expose that Farmers’