论文部分内容阅读
自“重写文学史”以来,中国现代文学史重建的学科范式,其中关注度高且热议多的应是“二十世纪中国文学”和“中华民国文学史”两个学科。前者作为文学史书写的学科范式,其规范性较为严正科学而学科意识的创新力度更强,当然它也具有明显的局限性。至于后者作为学科范式,它的优长是以现代民族国家观念作为“中华民国文学史”学科的思想基石,但是若联系民国时期并未真正实现辛亥革命的民主共和政体的历史事实,总感到与民国时期多元共生文学系统相契合的真实可信的文学史识、价值范畴、思维方法和阐释体系尚未建成。
Since the “Rewriting of Literary History”, the paradigm of reconstruction of the history of modern Chinese literature, with its high degree of concern and much discussion, should be both “Chinese Literature in the 20th Century” and “Literary History of the Republic of China” A subject. The former, as the discipline paradigm of writing history of literature, has more normative and more disciplined innovation and disciplinary innovation. Of course, it also has obvious limitations. As for the latter as a discipline paradigm, its superiority takes the concept of modern nation-state as the cornerstone of the “Republic of China Literature History” discipline. However, if the Republic of China did not truly meet the historical facts of the 1911 Revolution’s democratic republic, The real and credible literary history, value category, thinking method and interpretation system that always feel in harmony with the multiple symbiotic literature system of the Republic of China have not yet been completed.