论文部分内容阅读
【编者按】2008年8月25日至2008年8月29日召开的十一届全国人大常委会第四次会议对《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(七)(草案)》(以下简称《草案》)进行了初次审议。其不仅对于受贿罪、绑架罪、偷税罪、巨额财产来源不明罪等刑法固有罪名提出了一系列修改方案,而且对诸如侵犯个人信息行为、证券、期货交易中的“老鼠仓”等行为进行了刑法规制。目前,《草案》正在面向社会公开征求意见。对变法之利弊,各方更是踊跃建言。修正案内容的合理性、罪名构成的规范性乃至修正案的整体得失也随之成为近期学术界热议的话题,此时此际,我们有必要对相关背景与实体内容穷源竟委,明辨法理,分析利弊,以期立法能择善而从,以济世用。
[Editor’s note] August 25, 2008 to August 29, 2008 held at the Fourth Session of the Eleventh National People’s Congress on the “People’s Republic of China Criminal Law Amendment (VII) (Draft)” (hereinafter referred to as “the draft ”) For the first time. It not only provides a series of amendments to the inherent crimes of criminal law such as accepting bribes, kidnapping crimes, tax evasion crimes, and huge amounts of property with unidentified sources, but also offers a series of amendments to such acts as infringement of personal information, securities trading and futures trading Criminal law regulation. At present, the “draft” is open for public comment. On the pros and cons of the reform, all parties are even more enthusiastic about suggestions. The rationality of the amendments, the normative nature of the charges and even the overall gains and losses of the amendments have become the hot topics for the academic community in recent years. At this moment, it is necessary for us to make a thorough analysis of the background and substance of the source. Discrimination jurisprudence, analysis of pros and cons, with a view to legislation can choose the good from, to serve the world.