论文部分内容阅读
参考丈献表的编排有多种体例形式,并且不同体例中参考文献各著录项的表达也不尽相同。由于期刊大都倾向于采用自己所特定的参考文献著录格式,因而目前已有的参考文献软件并不能给予作者很多帮助,即作者如果将其稿件由某期刊改投到另一种期刊,通常需要改动其中的参考文献表格式和正文中的相关部分。在众多的参考文献表格式中,有两种最为主要。其一是在人文科学中较为常用的哈佛体系(即著者-出版年体系),该体系规定正文中给出引文的作者和出版年,文献书目中的引文按著者姓名的字母顺序和出版年的先后排列。另外一种主要的参考文献表是数字体系(顺序编码制),即正文中给出引文的序号,参考文献表中的各篇文献按其在正文中出现的先后顺序排列。科技论文和医学论文多采用该种体例。本文列举了上述两种体例的格式,并对比了二者的优缺点,认为著者-出版年体系可以使学术论文的读者很方便地了解作者所引用的工作是由谁完成的,而数字体系(顺序编码制)因为简洁,从而可以使读者更为通畅地阅读论文。
There are many ways to prepare the reference list, and the expressions of the bibliographic references in different ways are also different. Since most journals tend to adopt their own specific bibliographic format, the existing reference software can not provide much help to the author, that is, the author usually needs to change the manuscript if it is transferred from one journal to another Which the reference table format and the relevant part of the text. Of the many reference list formats, two are the most important ones. One is the more commonly used Harvard system (ie, author-year publication system) in the humanities, which stipulates the author and year of publication of citations in the body of the text, citations in the bibliography of the author in alphabetical order by the name of the author and the year of publication Arranged in succession Another major reference list is the digital system (sequential coding), which is given in the text of the citation number, the reference list of articles in the text according to the order of their appearance. Scientific papers and medical papers and more use of such methods. This article lists the format of the above two methods and compares the advantages and disadvantages of the two. It is believed that the author-publication year system can make it easy for readers of academic dissertations to understand who made the work cited by the author. And the digital system Sequential coding system) because it is concise, so that readers can read papers more smoothly.