论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨针对盆腔炎患者,观察选择物理方法联合左氧氟沙星完成治疗后获得的临床效果。方法:选择我院2013年05月-2015年05月盆腔炎患者102例。通过随机数表法完成盆腔炎患者的随机分组。C2组(对照组51例):临床选择左氧氟沙星进行治疗;C1组(观察组51例)临床选择物理方法+左氧氟沙星的方法进行治疗。对比两组患者在临床疗效、高切以及低切血黏度等方面表现出的差异。结果:两组盆腔炎患者完成临床治疗后,在临床疗效方面,C1组明显高于C2组盆腔炎患者(P<0.05);在患者高切、低切血黏度以及血浆浓度等方面,C1组明显优于C2组盆腔炎患者(P<0.05)。结论:针对盆腔炎患者,临床选择物理方法+左氧氟沙星的方法进行治疗,能够将患者临床疗效有效提高,有效促进患者血液功能的恢复,最终显著提高盆腔炎患者的生活质量。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of selective physical therapy and levofloxacin in patients with pelvic inflammatory disease. Methods: 102 cases of pelvic inflammatory disease in our hospital from May 2013 to May 2015 were selected. Patients randomized to pelvic inflammatory disease were randomized by random number table. C2 group (control group, 51 cases): levofloxacin clinical treatment; C1 group (observation group, 51 cases) clinical choice of physical methods + levofloxacin treatment. Comparing the two groups of patients in the clinical efficacy, high shear and low blood viscosity and other aspects of the show differences. Results: After the clinical treatment of two groups of patients with pelvic inflammatory disease, the clinical efficacy of C1 group was significantly higher than that of C2 group pelvic inflammatory disease patients (P <0.05); in patients with high-shear, low shear viscosity and plasma concentrations, C1 Obviously superior to the C2 group pelvic inflammatory disease patients (P <0.05). Conclusion: The clinical choice of physical methods + levofloxacin treatment for patients with pelvic inflammatory disease can effectively improve the clinical efficacy of patients, effectively promote the recovery of patients with blood function, and ultimately significantly improve the quality of life of patients with pelvic inflammatory disease.