论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨在下颌近中阻生智齿时分别利用微创拔牙法和传统拔牙法的治疗效果。方法收集鹤岗矿业集团公司总医院于2015年1-6月因下颌近中阻生智齿需要拔除的62例患者的临床资料,按其拔除方式分为两组即观察组和对照组,观察组使用微创拔牙法拔除下颌近中阻生智齿,对照组采取传统的凿劈法,每组各31例患者。比较两组手术时间、术后止血时间、患者心理耐受程度、术后肿胀程度、术后感染率及牙槽窝愈合时间等。结果观察组在手术时间和术后出血持续时间、术后肿胀程度及牙槽窝愈合时间都明显优于对照组。结论利用微创拔除下颌近中阻生智齿,具有手术时间短、创口小、疼痛轻等优势,其安全可靠,操作容易。
Objective To explore the effect of minimally invasive extraction and conventional extraction in the treatment of mandibular proximal wisdom tooth. Methods The clinical data of 62 patients who needed removal of mandibular proximal wisdom teeth from January to June 2015 in General Hospital of Hegang Mining Group were collected and divided into observation group and control group according to the method of their removal. Minimally invasive extraction of mandibular proximal probing wisdom teeth, the control group to take the traditional chiseling method, each group of 31 patients. The operation time, postoperative hemostasis time, psychological tolerance, postoperative swelling, postoperative infection rate and the healing time of alveolar fossa were compared between the two groups. Results The observation group was significantly better than the control group in operation time and duration of postoperative bleeding, postoperative swelling and healing time of alveolar fossa. Conclusion Minimally invasive removal of mandibular impeding wisdom teeth, with short operation time, small wound, light pain and other advantages, its safe and reliable, easy to operate.