论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察玉盆滴注液系列方配合正压式多用灌注器灌肠治疗慢性盆腔炎的临床疗效。方法:将300患者例随机分为3组各100例,西药组采用西医常规治疗;普通灌肠组采用玉盆滴注液系列方配合吊桶式中药直肠灌肠治疗;正压灌肠组采用玉盆滴注液系列方配合正压式多用灌注器灌肠治疗,对3组患者临床疗效、复发率进行比较。结果:总有效率正压灌肠组为92.0%,普通灌肠组为81.0%,西药组为68.0%。正压灌肠组、普通灌肠组总有效率均高于西药组,差异有显著性或非常显著性意义(P<0.05,P<0.01);正压灌肠组与普通灌肠组总有效率比较,差异有显著性意义(P<0.05)。随访1年,正压灌肠组、普通灌肠组、西药组复发率分别为8.0%、9.0%、17.0%,西药组复发率高于前2组(P<0.05);普通灌肠组与正压灌肠组复发率相当(P>0.05)。结论:正压式多用灌注器中药直肠灌注治疗盆腔炎疗效显著,值得临床推广应用。
Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of jade basin infusion series with positive pressure multi-purpose infusion enema in the treatment of chronic pelvic inflammatory disease. Methods: 300 patients were randomly divided into three groups of 100 cases, the Western medicine group with Western medicine routine treatment; ordinary enema group with jade basin drip series with bucket barrel medicine rectal enema treatment; positive pressure enema group jade basin instillation Liquid series with positive pressure multi-purpose infusion enema treatment, the clinical efficacy of three groups of patients, the recurrence rate comparison. Results: The total effective rate was 92.0% in the positive enema group, 81.0% in the common enema group and 68.0% in the western medicine group. The total effective rate in positive pressure enema group and common enema group was higher than that in western medicine group, the difference was significant or very significant (P <0.05, P <0.01); The total effective rate in positive pressure enema group and common enema group was significantly different There was significant (P <0.05). The follow-up of 1 year showed that the recurrence rates in the positive enema group, the common enema group and the western medicine group were 8.0%, 9.0% and 17.0% respectively, and the recurrence rates in the western medicine group were higher than those in the former two groups (P <0.05) The recurrence rate was similar (P> 0.05). Conclusion: Positive pressure multi-purpose perfusion medicine rectal perfusion treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease significant effect, worthy of clinical application.