论文部分内容阅读
鉴于WTO成员反倾销实践中“公共利益”评价的不统一,在修订WTO反倾销协议时引入“公共利益”评价的呼声日渐强烈,多哈回合谈判有关反倾销协议修订的主席案文对此作了相应规定。反规避作为反倾销的重要延伸和发展,在反规避立法中考虑“公共利益”问题理应是大势所趋。随着欧美对华反规避调查的逐年上升,我国应当扬弃欧美反倾销“公共利益”评价机制存在的问题,力主在反规避国际立法中公平合理地引入“公共利益”评价机制。
In view of the non-uniform evaluation of “public interest” in the anti-dumping practice of WTO members, there is an increasing demand for the introduction of “public interest ” evaluation in the revision of the WTO anti-dumping agreement. The Chairman’s text on the revision of the Doha Round anti-dumping agreement was made The corresponding provisions. As an important extension and development of anti-dumping, anti-circumvention should consider the issue of “public interest ” in anti-circumvention legislation. With the rising anti-circumvention investigations in Europe and the United States, China should abandon the problems existing in the evaluation system of anti-dumping and “public interest” in Europe and the United States, and advocate the introduction of a “public interest” evaluation mechanism in the anti-circumvention international legislation.