论文部分内容阅读
目的观察肾细胞癌(肾癌)超声造影表现,以探讨超声造影对肾癌的临床诊断价值。方法分析106例经手术和病理检查证实的肾癌患者的常规超声及超声造影资料,比较两种方法对肾癌假包膜的显示能力。结果 106例肾癌中,肾透明细胞癌98例,多房性囊性肾细胞癌3例,乳头状肾细胞癌5例。超声造影显示假包膜80例(75.4%),而常规超声显示假包膜29例(27.3%),超声造影及常规超声均不显示假包膜26例,两者间差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论超声造影对肾癌假包膜显示率明显高于常规超声,超声造影对诊断肾癌有重要的临床价值。
Objective To observe the manifestations of renal cell carcinoma (renal cell carcinoma) in order to investigate the clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma. Methods The routine ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound data of 106 renal cell carcinoma patients confirmed by operation and pathology were analyzed. The two methods were compared to display the pseudocapsule of renal cell carcinoma. Results In 106 cases of renal cell carcinoma, there were 98 cases of clear cell renal cell carcinoma, 3 cases of multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma and 5 cases of papillary renal cell carcinoma. Contrast ultrasound showed 80 cases (75.4%) of pseudocapsules, while routine ultrasound showed pseudocapsules in 29 cases (27.3%), ultrasound and routine ultrasound did not show pseudocapsules in 26 cases, the difference was statistically significant ( P <0.01). Conclusion Contrast-enhanced ultrasound demonstrated that the pseudocapsule of renal cell carcinoma was significantly higher than that of conventional ultrasound. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound had important clinical value in the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma.