论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较不同心理干预方法对坑道作业官兵心理适应能力的影响。方法:某部坑道作业官兵140例,随机分为观察组与对照组各70例。对照组以常规心理宣教引导为主,观察组在其基础上增加行为训练;两组干预前后均采用症状自评量表(SCL-90)对所有官兵进行心理测评。结果:(1)心理干预前两组SCL-90因子分值除敌对、偏执、精神病性外,其他因子分值均显著高于中国军人常模(P<0.05);(2)心理干预后两组的强迫症状、抑郁、恐怖因子分值显著降低(P<0.05);(3)观察组除了抑郁和偏执外,其余各因子分值均显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:采用宣教加行为训练的心理干预方法对提高坑道作业官兵心理适应能力效果更好。
Objective: To compare the effect of different psychological intervention methods on the psychological adaptability of the tunneling officers and soldiers. Methods: A total of 140 officers and men working in tunnels were randomly divided into observation group (70 cases) and control group (70 cases). The control group was guided by traditional psychological mission guidance, and the observation group increased their behavioral training on the basis of them. Before and after the intervention, psychological self-rating scale (SCL-90) was used to evaluate all the officers and men. Results: (1) The SCL-90 scores of the two groups were significantly higher than those of Chinese soldiers except for hostility, paranoid and psychosis (P <0.05), (2) (P <0.05). (3) In addition to depression and paranoid, the scores of other factors in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: The psychological intervention using propaganda and behavioral training is more effective in improving the psychological adaptability of officers and soldiers in tunneling operations.