论文部分内容阅读
贿赂治理的理想是有效威慑贿赂,降低或消除行贿或受贿的激励。基于此种理想,贿赂额的追缴应当考虑贿赂的不同时间标准而以“数额高者”为标准。而目前的司法实践和学界通说均以静态化的“受贿时的数额”为标准,此种标准既不能有效体现贿赂治理的理想目标,又可能在某些情况下产生鼓励贿赂的后果,无法获得法律上的正当性和民众的正义直觉。日本法上对此也有不同争论,但学术界普遍认为,法律在这方面应当发挥更大威慑作用。我国的司法实践完全能够在既有的法律制度框架内实现从“受贿时数额”向“数额高者”的转型,以实现贿赂治理的理想。
The ideal of bribery governance is to effectively deter bribery and to reduce or eliminate incentives to bribe or take bribes. Based on this ideal, recovery of the amount of bribe should take into account different time standards of bribe and take “higher amount ” as the standard. However, the current judicial practice and academic scholarship are both based on the static “amount at the time of bribe”, which can not effectively reflect the ideal goal of bribery governance and may in some cases result in the encouragement of bribery , Can not get legal legitimacy and public opinion of justice. There are different arguments in Japanese law, but academics generally believe that the law should play a more deterrent role in this respect. Judicial practice in our country can fully realize the transformation from the “amount” of “bribe” to “the highest one” within the framework of the existing legal system so as to realize the ideal of bribery governance.