论文部分内容阅读
43项达标活动,37项集资收费,全方位地落在农民个人头上,其“负担”不可谓不重;事关经济建设全局,社会安定大事,确是非减不可!毫无疑问,其中涉及卫生初保的项目,当然应遵照执行。但是,取消达标后初保工作还搞不搞?减轻“负担”,健康投资还要不要?“负担”不仅是个社会问题,同时也是个哲学问题,它具有两面性,并且要互相转化,关键是我们如何正确处理。假若片面理解“达标”、“集资”而停止初保工作,农民基本医疗保健得不到保障,导致疾病流
Forty-three items of compliance activities and 37 items of fund-raising fees fall on all sides of the peasants’ personal heads. The “burden” is undeniable; it is related to the overall situation of economic construction, and social stability matters are indeed non-reduction. It is undoubtedly involved. The health protection project should of course be followed. However, after the cancellation of the standard, the primary protection work still fails to reduce the “burden” and not to invest in health. The “burden” is not only a social issue, but also a philosophical issue. It has two sides and it needs to be transformed. The key is our How to deal with it correctly. If one-sided understanding of “reaching standards” and “financing” and stopping primary insurance work, basic medical care for farmers cannot be guaranteed, resulting in a disease flow.