论文部分内容阅读
《中国社会主义建设》课的理论主线是当今我国社会生产力、生产关系和上层建筑的矛盾运动及其规律。正确地把握这条主线,并恰当而紧密地联系我国的历史和现实,就能使学生从理论到实际正确地认识我国的社会主义实践,并克服与澄清错误认识。比如,我国的改革本是社会主义制度的自我完善和发展,但是由于资产阶级自由化思潮的影响,有些学生却总认为改革是社会主义为了摆脱自身的危机。我们的《社建》课就按研究生产力、生产关系与上层建筑三者的矛盾运动及其规律这一理论主线的要求,考察和论述了我国社会主义革命的特殊历史进程——首先进行上层建筑领域里的革命,建立起无产阶级专政;然后进行生产资料的社会主义改造,建立社会主义生产关系;再以后自然要大力发展生产力,为社会主义社会建立强大的物质基础。而在现阶段,就必须调整生产力、生产关系与上层建筑三者的关系以适应生产力发展的需要。这样就帮助学生比较具体而深入地了解了社会主义改革的客观性与普遍性,也澄清了所谓改革是摆脱危机的错误认识。
The theoretical main line in the course of “China's socialist construction” is the contradictory movement and its laws in our country's social productive forces, production relations and superstructure. Correctly grasping this main line and properly and closely contacting the history and reality of our country enable our students to correctly understand our socialist practice and to overcome and clarify our erroneous understandings from theory to reality. For example, the reform in our country was originally the self-improvement and development of the socialist system. However, due to the influence of the trend of bourgeois liberalization, some students always considered the reform as a crisis in which socialism got rid of itself. Our “social construction” class examines and discusses the special historical process of our socialist revolution in accordance with the theoretical main line of the contradictions and laws in the study of productivity, production relations, and superstructure. In the first stage, the superstructure Revolution in the field and establish the dictatorship of the proletariat; and then carry out the socialist transformation of the means of production and establish the socialist relations of production. Naturally thereafter it is necessary to vigorously develop the productive forces and establish a strong material foundation for the socialist society. At this stage, however, it is necessary to adjust the relations between the productive forces, the relations of production and the superstructure to meet the needs of the development of the productive forces. This helps students to understand more specifically and in-depth the objectivity and universality of the socialist reform and clarifies what they call the wrong understanding of getting rid of the crisis.