论文部分内容阅读
《基础教育课程改革纲要(试行)》明确指出:“国家课程标准是教材编写、教学、评估和考试命题的依据,是国家管理和评价课程的基础。”这表明《课程标准》具有法定的性质,是教育管理、教材编写、教师教学的直接依据,是评估与考试的标尺,由此可以看出《课程标准》的重要地位,它对教师教学行为的重要性不言而喻。但是,在平时的教研、听课及开展的活动中,我发现一些教师不重视《课程标准》的学习,备课时基本不看,更谈不上研究了,而且有的教师在使
The Outline of the Basic Education Curriculum Reform (Trial) clearly states that: “The national curriculum standard is the basis for textbook preparation, teaching, assessment and examination propositions, and is the basis of the national management and evaluation curriculum.” This indicates that the “course standard” has statutory The nature of education is a direct basis for education management, textbook compilation, and teacher education. It is a yardstick for assessment and examination. From this, one can see the important status of the “course standard”. It is self-evident that it is important for teachers’ teaching behavior. However, in the usual teaching and research, lectures and activities, I found that some teachers do not pay attention to the study of the “curriculum standards,” and basically do not read when preparing lessons, let alone study, and some teachers are making