论文部分内容阅读
由于其争议性较大(无论在细节还是在主题上),不义管家的比喻是耶稣比喻中最难解的经文之一,也是学者讨论最为丰富的经文之一。简单地讲,出于对16:8a-13的不同理解,学者们的诠释可以分为两个阵营,一派认为16:8a-13是对管家行动的真赞美,而另一派则认为只是一种讽刺性的批评。由于第一阵营的诠释(财富使用)有最强有力的经文支持(αδικιαζ表明本文认为管家的行动并不诚实,μαμωυαζ的三次出现表明财富是本节的讨论重点),本文将沿着这一诠释思路,在结合文本上下文处境和当时社会文化处境(朋友关系和管家职分)的基础上,讨论这段经文作为门徒观教导的一部分,如何借用并重新诠释罗马社会的朋友关系和管家职分,将耶稣有关门徒财富观的教导传递给富人,教导他们认识到自己只是钱财的管家,勉励他们把握机会正确地使用钱财,以获得永生的回报。
Because of its controversy, both in detail and in thematic, the parable of the unjust steward is one of the most intractable passages in the parable of Jesus and one of the most versatile passages discussed by scholars. To put it simply, out of a different understanding of 16: 8a-13, scholars’ interpretations can be divided into two camps, one that 16: 8a-13 is the true compliment to the steward’s action, and the other that is just one Satirical criticism. As the first camp interpretation (use of wealth) has the most powerful verse support (αδικιαζ indicates that this article considers steward action is not honest, μαμωυαζ three appearances that wealth is the focus of this section), this article will follow this Interpretation of ideas, based on the context of the text context and the current social and cultural situation (friend relations and stewardship), based on the discussion of this passage as a disciple of teaching as part of how to borrow and reinterpret Roman friends and stewardship, Passing Jesus ’teachings on the disciples’ riches to the rich teaches them to recognize that they are stewards of money and encourages them to seize the opportunity to use money properly for the return of eternal life.