论文部分内容阅读
随着我国科研体制改革的深入和国家对科技文化投入的不断加大,如何正确评价科研成果已经引起社会越来越多的关注。其中,人文社会科学开始借鉴自然科学的评价方法,特别是把量化管理运用到人文社会科学中去,使之逐渐成为全国高校、科研院所等科研单位主要的科研考核方法和标准。此种做法,引发了人文社会科学界的一片热议,其中,以反对、批评之声占绝对主导地位,成为科研量化管理评价的主流话语。在各种指责与声讨声中,情绪发泄多于理性分
With the deepening of the reform of China's scientific research system and the ever-increasing investment in science and technology by the state, how to correctly evaluate the achievements in scientific research has drawn more and more attention from the society. Among them, the humanities and social sciences began to learn from the natural sciences evaluation methods, especially the quantitative management applied to the humanities and social sciences, so that it gradually become the country's universities, research institutes and other research institutes and major research methods and standards. This kind of approach has triggered a heated debate in the humanities and social sciences. Among them, the voice of opposition and criticism has the absolute dominant status and has become the mainstream discourse of quantitative evaluation of scientific research. In a variety of accusations and denunciations of emotional vent more than rational points