论文部分内容阅读
同志们!在座的不少同志昨天参加了中国文学艺术界联合会主席团、中国作家协会主席团扩大联席会议,听了郭沫若、茅盾和周扬同志的发言,今天的“人民日报”上发表了昨天大会上通过的“关於‘文艺报’的决议”。“文艺报”的错误决不是偶然的,也决不是“文艺报”所独有的。作为中国戏剧家协会的编辑出版部门,我们特别需要深刻认识“文艺报”的错误性质,从“文艺报”的错误中吸取教训,切实检查并改进我们的编辑工作。这里,我想根据“关于‘文艺报’的决议”,谈谈我自己对于“文艺报”错误的认识,同时联系到我们的编辑工作——特别是“剧本”月刊和“戏剧报”工作中存在的问题,提出检查工作的初步意见。“决议”指出,“文艺报”的错误主要是:“对于文艺上的资产阶级错误思想的容忍和投降,对于马克思主义新生力量的轻视和压制,在文艺批评上的粗暴、武断和压制自由讨论的恶劣作风。”并且指出,“这些错误的性质是严重的,是违背马克思主义的立场和党的文艺方针的。”“文艺报”的错误,在有关“红楼梦”的问题上尖锐地表现了出来。“文艺报”对宣传胡适派资产阶级唯心论观点的错误著作“采取了讚扬和保护的态度,对青年的马克思主义者向资产阶级唯心论开火的正确的批评文章,却采取了轻视和压制的态度。”“文艺报”这一违背马克恩主义立场的重大错误行为,引起了党报的干涉。十月二十八日“人民日报”发表了“质问‘文艺报’编者”一文,不但对“文艺报”提出了严正的批评,并且对整个文艺界敲起了警钟。另一方面,封建的、资产阶级的反动的、黄色的、腐朽的文艺作品还在人民群众中起着腐蚀作用。文艺工作、文艺批评的马克思主义立场,还必须表现在对封建的、资产阶级的反人民的文艺进行坚决的斗争;为社会主义新文艺的发展开辟道路,保护并扶持其成长。这并不是说不要批评新文艺的缺点,不要对新生力量提出严格的要求,而是说批评应该适当,应该满怀热情,不应对新事物采取苛刻的打击的态度。在批评工作中应贯彻党性原则。“文艺报”偏偏在上述方针性、原则性的问题上违背了马克思主义的立
Comrades, many of you here today participated in the presidium of the Federation of Chinese Literary and Art Circles, the Bureau of the Chinese Writers Association expanded the joint meeting, and after listening to Comrades Guo Moruo, Mao Dun and Zhou Yang, today’s People’s Daily published the speech at yesterday’s General Assembly Passed the “resolution on the” art newspaper. “ The error of ”literary newspaper“ is by no means accidental, nor is it unique to the literary newspaper. As an editor and publisher of the Chinese Dramatists Association, we especially need a deep understanding of the erroneous nature of the literary newspaper, learning lessons from the mistakes in the literary newspaper and earnestly examining and improving our editorial work. Here, I would like to talk about my own understanding of the errors of the ”literary arts newspaper“ in accordance with the ”Resolution on the Literary Art Newspaper,“ and at the same time, contact our editorial work - in particular, the ”Script“ magazine and the ”Drama Newspaper“ The problems that exist, put forward the initial opinion of the inspection work. The ”Resolution“ pointed out that the main errors of the ”literary newspaper“ are: ”Tolerance and surrender of the bourgeois misconceptions of literature and art, contempt and repression of the new forces of Marxism, and discussion of the crudeness, arbitrariness and repression of freedom in literary criticism And pointed out that “the nature of these errors is grave and contrary to the Marxist standpoint and the party’s art and literature guideline.” The error of “literary arts newspaper” sharply manifested itself in the issue of “Dream of Red Mansions” come out. The literary newspaper adopted a commendatory and protective attitude toward the erroneous work of promoting the view of Hu Shih’s bourgeois idealism and adopted a contempt and repression of the correct criticism of the young Marxists who opened fire on bourgeois idealism . “The” Wen Yi Bao “, a gross wrong act that violated the position of Marxism, aroused the interference of the party newspaper. On October 28, the People’s Daily published a ”questioning the editor of a literary newspaper,“ not only making solemn criticisms of the ”Literary Arts Newspaper,“ but also beating the entire literary and art circles. On the other hand, feudal and bourgeois reactionary, yellow and decadent literary and art works also play a corrosive role among the people. The Marxist stance of literary and art work and literary criticism must also be manifested in resolute struggles against feudal and bourgeois anti-popular literature and art; to open the way for the development of the new socialist art and literature and to protect and support its growth. This is not to say that we should not criticize the shortcomings of the new literature and art. Instead of putting strict demands on the new forces, we should say that criticism should be appropriate. We should be enthusiastic and should not take a harsh blow to new things. In the process of criticizing, we should implement the principle of party spirit. The ”Literary Arts" just broke the Marxist standpoint on the above-mentioned principles and principles