论文部分内容阅读
庄存与的《公羊》学虽然受到赵《春秋属辞》的影响 ,但主要限于治学体例 ,而在治学立场上 ,二者其实有根本的歧异。庄存与克服了赵以策书之体说《春秋》的倾向 ,并注重《春秋》例辞背后的立场。这点直接上承汉代《公羊》学。不过 ,庄氏《春秋》学在某些具体的事例解释上与汉代《公羊》学也有差异。庄氏的特点在于对《春秋》变辞的引申与发挥 ,并补充了汉代《公羊》学未曾论述的诸多方面 ,为后人理解《公羊》大义提供了新的线索。
Although the study of “Rams” of Zhuang Chuandu is influenced by Zhaowang’s “Spring and Autumn Songs”, it is mainly confined to the system of scholarship. In fact, there is a fundamental discrepancy between the two. Zhuang Cun and overcoming the tendency of Zhao Yong to say “Chun Qiu” in the style of curse of the book, and pay attention to the position behind “Spring and Autumn Anno”. This directly on the Han Dynasty “ram” learn. However, Chuang’s Spring and Autumn Annals also differs from the “Rams” in the Han Dynasty in terms of some specific examples. The characteristics of Zhuang’s lies in the extension and exertion of the rhetoric in the Spring and Autumn Annals and the supplement of many aspects that were not discussed in the study of the “Ram” in the Han Dynasty. It provides new clues for future generations to understand the meaning of the “Rams.”