论文部分内容阅读
目的 制定2019-nCoV院内感染调研与分析工具,并行初步验证.方法 研究小组基于前期循证制定的“新型冠状病毒医护感染过程及防控调研问卷”,主要通过细化问卷调研目的、建立问卷条目池、评估问卷的效度三个步骤进行改编.结果 形成了新型冠状病毒院内感染调研与分析工具,包括行政后勤感染组、医护对照组、行政后勤对照组3个问卷.问卷内容与研究目标具有较高的一致性.行政后勤感染组问卷包括“确诊前”、“确诊后”2个领域的调查,其中,“确诊前”涉及感染原因分析、确诊前防控方案、确诊前防控知识、确诊前心理上对疫情的应对状态4个部分,共计16个条目;“确诊后”包括确诊后症状、确诊后治疗、感染后对周围环境和人造成的影响、确诊后心理、感染后防护认识5个方面,共计21个条目.医护对照组问卷涉及与是否感染有关的工作或生活行为、防控相关行为、防控相关知识、心理上对疫情的应对状态4个方面,共计29个条目.行政后勤对照组问卷涉及的领域与医护对照组问卷相同,共计20个条目.结论 本研究完成了2019-nCoV院内感染调研与分析工具的制定,共涉及2019-nCoV感染医院非医护工作人员感染过程及防控调研——行政、后勤人员专用,2019-nCoV感染医护感染对照组调研问卷——医护对照组,2019-nCoV感染医护感染对照组调研问卷——行政后勤对照组3个问卷,问卷的信度和效度均可靠、可行性良好.“,”Objective To formulate the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) nosocomial infection research and analysis tools. Methods Based on the questionnaire for infection process and prevention of 2019-nCoV infection in medical staffs, we developed the new questionnaire by means of three procedures including refining the purpose of the questionnaire, establishing the item pool, and evaluating the content validity of the questionnaire. Results We formulated three questionnaires for 2019-nCoV releated nosocomial infection including questionnaires for staff in administrative and logistics departments, the non-infected health care staff, and non-infected staff in administrative and logistics departments. The content of the questionnaires were consistent with the research objectives. The questionnaire for COVID-19 among staff in administrative and logistics departments included two aspects of investigation before and after diagnosis, “before diagnosis” involved infection cause, plan of prevention and control, knowledge of prevention and control, and psychological symptoms, there were 16 items in total; “after diagnosis” included 5 parts, including symptoms after diagnosis, treatment after diagnosis, impact on the surrounding environment and people after infection, psychology symptoms, awareness of protection, there were 21 items in total. The questionnaire for COVID-19 among non-infected health care staff included analysis of causes of infection in work and life, relevant prevention and control behaviors, infection prevention and control knowledge and psychological response to the epidemic, there were 29 items in total; the questionnaire for COVID-19 among non-infected staff in administrative and logistics departments included same aspects as questionnaire for COVID-19 among non-infected health care staff, and also 20 items. Conclusions We developed questionnaires for 2019-nCoV releated nosocomial infection including a study on infection processes and prevention measures for COVID-19 among staff in administrative and logistics departments, a study on infection processes and prevention measures for COVID-19 among non-infected healthcare staff, and a study on infection processes and prevention measures for COVID-19 among non-infected staff in administrative and logistics departments. The reliability, validity, and practicability of these questionnaires are all acceptable.