论文部分内容阅读
近读国内学人关于中国叙事学研究的论著颇感欣喜。例如,从中西姓名顺序和时间记忆方式的不同,印证中国叙事的整体观;从“史”和“事”在文字学意义上的关联,考察中国文学叙事的历史性;从作者、读者和评点家的历史文化背景,考察中国叙事的独特性,等等。这类研究,突破了西方叙事学就文本研究文本的局限,而是以整个人类文化为背景、为依托,将文学叙事同人类的思维方式、民族的文化性格相沟连,从而为中国叙事学研究拓展出广阔的地平线。其成功经验证明,文化学的视野和方法是文学研究的利器之一。毫无疑问,这也是近年来文学研究青睐文化学的重要原因。
It is quite delightful to read the treatises by domestic scholars on the study of Chinese narratology. For example, from the difference between the order of Chinese and Western names and the way of time memorization, the whole concept of Chinese narration is confirmed; the historical significance of the narration of Chinese literature is examined from the philological meaning of “history ” and “matter ”; , The historical and cultural backgrounds of readers and commentators, the uniqueness of Chinese narratives, and more. This kind of research breaks through the limitations of textual research texts in Western narratology. Instead, it relies on the whole of human culture as a backdrop to connect literary narratives with humanistic ways of thinking and ethnic cultural identities, Research to develop a broad horizon. Its successful experience proves that the cultural field of vision and method is one of the instruments of literature research. There is no doubt that this is also an important reason for the favor of the study of culture in recent years.