论文部分内容阅读
在我国法学界关于法的概念的论争中,有一种将法的职能、功能同法的本质等同起来或混淆起来的现象.主要表现为这样一种观点,就是认为“镇压敌对阶级,以便建立对统治阶级有利的社会关系和社会秩序”即“法的阶级性”,仅是法的本质的一个方面;法的本质的另一个方面,则是“管理公共事务”即“法的社会性”。还有人从国家统治的政治职能和社会职能的关系上寻找论据。他们引证恩格斯在《反杜林论》中的一段话:“政治统治到处都是以执行某种社会职能为基础,而且政治统治只有在它执行了它的这种社会职能时才能持续
In the debate on the concept of law in our country’s jurisprudence, there is a phenomenon of equating or confusing the functions and functions of the law with the essence of the law, mainly manifested in the view that “repression of the hostile class in order to establish The favorable social relations and social order of the ruling class ”ie“ the class nature of the law ”are only one aspect of the essence of the law. Another aspect of the essence of the law is“ the management of public affairs ”or“ the sociality of the law. ” Others look for arguments from the relationship between the political and social functions of state rule. They cite Engels’s passage in Anti-Duhring: "Political rule is everywhere based on the implementation of some social function, and political rule can only continue if it performs its social function