论文部分内容阅读
本刊总8期刊登了刘明同学的文章后,收到了一些读者的来信。广州美院艺术史论教研室李公明、李行远同志指出,文中关于哥特建筑的例子有常识性的错误,批评是中肯的。这是我们编辑,校对工作的严重失职,我们要吸取这次教训、改进工作。现将该信刊载于后,对李公明、李行远同志表示感谢,并向广大读者致歉。此外,还有些读者来信提出,已经有了实用、经济、美观三原则,似乎不必另立标准了。我们认为刘明同学提出的问题与三原则并不矛盾,而且是一个必要的补充。我们大家都公认,三原则是两千多年前维持鲁威提出的,他在《建筑十书》中写道:“一切建筑物都应恰如其分地考虑到坚固耐久、便利实
After publishing the articles of Liu Ming’s students in the 8th issue of this journal, they received letters from some readers. Li Gongming and Comrade Li Xingyuan of the Art History Research Office of the Guangzhou Academy of Art pointed out that the examples of Gothic architecture in the text are common-sense mistakes, and criticism is pertinent. This is a serious negligence for our editors and proofreaders. We must learn this lesson and improve our work. The letter is now postponed, expressing thanks to Comrade Li Gongming and Comrade Li Xingyuan and apologizing to readers. In addition, some readers wrote that there are already three principles of practicality, economy, and beauty, and it seems that there is no need for a separate standard. We believe that the problem raised by Liu Ming is not in contradiction with the three principles and it is a necessary supplement. We all recognize that the three principles were put forward by Lu Wei more than 2,000 years ago. In “The Ten Books of Architecture,” he wrote: "Every building should be properly considered as durable and convenient.