论文部分内容阅读
本文以施密特的两个命题为中心。第一个命题:世俗化命题——现代国家理论中的几乎所有重要概念都是世俗化了的神学概念。世俗化命题建构古今之间的连续性,针对的是现代性的自我主张,否定现代的独立性(否定其有独立的正当性。施密特与布鲁门伯格的争议将是本文的最终落脚点,尽管我不会直接去处理他们之间的理论争论)。新旧正当性的历史性转变(革命)其实只是一桩改头换面的事情。因此,世俗化命题意味着从君主正当性到民主正当性,或者从神到人的革命性转变当中,把有本质性的东西维持下来,并且仍然构成其本质。
This article centers on two of Schmidt’s propositions. The First Proposition: The Secularization Proposition - Almost all of the important concepts in modern state theory are secularized theological concepts. The secularization proposition constructs the continuity between the ancient and the modern, aiming at the self-assertion of modernity and negating the independence of the modernity (negating the legitimacy of its independence.) The controversy between Schmidt and Blumenberg will be the final of this article End, although I will not go directly to deal with the theoretical controversy between them). The historic transformation of old and new legitimacy (revolution) is in fact a pan-headgear. Therefore, the secularization proposition implies that the essential things should be maintained and still constitute their essence from the legitimacy of monarchs to the justification of democracy or the transformation from God to man.