论文部分内容阅读
目的分析剖宫产新生儿应用早期护理干预模式的效果。方法选取产科门诊2014年2月—2015年6月期间出生的160例剖宫产新生儿作为研究对象,采用随机数字分组法将其分为观察组与对照组,每组80例。对照组新生儿采取临床常规护理模式,观察组新生儿在常规护理模式基础上实施早期护理干预模式,对比2组新生儿的母乳喂养率及各项临床健康指标差异。结果经临床不同护理模式干预后,观察组80例新生儿母乳喂养率达83.75%,对照组80例新生儿母乳喂养率为82.50%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但2组新生儿临床健康指标对比,观察组80例新生儿经早期护理干预后,生理性体重下降率为17.50%、皮疹、脓疱痘发生率为2.50%,相比对照组新生儿生理性体重下降率为40.00%、皮疹、脓疱痘发生率为13.75%,组间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);且观察组新生儿大小便次正常者、黄疸消褪时间等指标,也均明显优于对照组新生儿,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论针对剖宫产新生儿积极给予早期护理干预模式,相比应用传统护理干预模式而言,更能够有效提高新生儿母乳喂养率,促进新生儿机体健康发育的同时,强化新生儿预后生活质量,值得临床进一步应用推广。
Objective To analyze the effect of early nursing intervention on neonates with cesarean section. Methods A total of 160 newborn cesarean section born in obstetrics and gynecology clinic from February 2014 to June 2015 were selected as the research object and divided into observation group and control group by random number grouping method, 80 cases in each group. The control group of newborns to take clinical routine nursing mode, the observation group of newborns on the basis of conventional nursing mode of implementation of early nursing intervention model, comparing the two groups of newborns breastfeeding rate and the clinical differences in clinical indicators. Results After the intervention of different clinical modes, the breast-feeding rate of 80 newborns in the observation group was 83.75%, while that of the control group was 82.50%, the difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). However, compared with the clinical health indicators of two groups of newborns, 80 newborns in the observation group after the early nursing intervention, the physiological weight loss rate was 17.50%, the incidence of rash, pus bleed pox was 2.50%, compared with the control group neonatal physiological The rate of weight loss was 40.00%. The incidence of skin rashes and pustules was 13.75%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). The index of neonatal normal urine volume and jaundice fading time in the observation group was also Were significantly better than the control group of newborns, the difference between the groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion For the newborns with cesarean section, the model of early nursing intervention is positive. Compared with the traditional nursing intervention mode, it is more effective in raising the rate of newborn breast-feeding and promoting the healthy development of neonates. At the same time, It is worth further clinical application.