论文部分内容阅读
[主持人的话] 首期论坛点评公布后,受到多方师友的热情鼓励和悉心指教,令我们感动不已。唯一的图报之途,就是加倍努力。本论坛设立的初衷之一是重倡“纯文学”的艺术标准,以对抗流行标准的“大势所趋”。同时,我们也提出,“纯文学”的概念需要拓宽。随着研讨的实地展开,我们越发感觉到拓宽的必要性。一方面,80年代元气丰沛的先锋革命如今只剩流风余韵,甚至变成装腔作势的“伪先锋”,这一脉作品实在已撑不起文学的大梁。另一方
[Moderator’s remark] After the announcement of the first forum review, we were touched by the enthusiastic encouragement and careful advice from various faculty members. The only way to figure out is to redouble our efforts. One of the original intentions set up by this forum is to reinvigorate the artistic standard of “pure literature” and to counter the “general trend” of popular standards. At the same time, we also propose that the concept of “pure literature” needs to be broadened. As the field of study unfolds, we increasingly feel the need to broaden. On the one hand, the vanguard avant-garde revolution of the 1980s now only has a residual rumor and even has become a pretentious “pseudo-vanguard.” This work of art can hardly afford the backbone of literature. The other party