论文部分内容阅读
后人撰写、研究历史,理应尽可能的准确。但是,因时间相隔较久而导致当事人的记忆模糊,或引用的资料来源不尽相同等诸多因素,对同一史实时常会出现一些不同的说法,从而引起争论,这是正常的现象。现发表关于本刊去年第5期刊登的《碧血沃陇原,丹心照来人》一文的两封来信,意在说明,我们是愿意尊重事实的,读者如发现本刊发表的文章有不符合事实之处可以坦诚提出,开展讨论和互补,以期让事实更清楚,结论更准确。
Descendants of writing, research history, should be as accurate as possible. However, it is normal to argue that there may be some differences between the same historical facts and from time to time in the memory of the parties’ vague memories or the different sources of information quoted. Two letters are now published on the fifth issue of our magazine entitled “The Worthy of the Dark Blood, the Heart of the Heart”. This is intended to show that we are willing to respect the facts. If readers find any articles published in this publication not in conformity Facts can be put forward frankly, discussing and complementing each other with a view to making the facts clearer and the conclusions more accurate.