论文部分内容阅读
优秀女教师高丽娅呕心沥血,十几年里先后将自己的教学经验写成48本教案交给了学校。然而,当她因编写论文集需要参考这些教案时,学校却无法提供其中的44本教案。事情发展到最后,执著的高丽娅竟被学校安排下岗。万般无奈之下,高丽娅将学校告上法庭,要求归还44本教案并赔偿损失。由于我国现行的法律法规都没有明确规定教案的著作权、归属权问题,因而这起全国首例教案官司受到司法届、教育届的广泛关注。2003年4月12日,重庆市南岸区人民法院对此案进行了重审。那么,教师的教案有没有著作权?教案娃“公”还是娃“私”?高丽娅能得到一个满意的说法吗?
Outstanding painter Gao Li painstaking work, more than a decade has its own teaching experience written 48 lesson plans to the school. However, when she needed to refer to these lesson plans for her compilation of essays, she could not provide 44 of the lesson plans. Things developed to the end, persistent Gao Liya was laid off by the school. Desperation, Gao Liya school will be brought to court, asked to return 44 lesson plans and compensate for the loss. Since none of the current laws and regulations in our country stipulate explicitly the copyright and ownership of teaching plans, the first case of lawsuit and case lawsuit in our country was widely concerned by the judicial and educational sessions. On April 12, 2003, Nan'an District People's Court of Chongqing Municipality re-examined the case. So, the teacher's lesson plans are there any copyright? Teaching baby “public ” or baby “private ”? Gao Liya can get a satisfactory statement?