论文部分内容阅读
朱(熹)陆(九渊)异同之辩是中国哲学史上的一大公案,迄今已达八百年之久。正如明代陈建所称“朱陆之辩,数百年未了底大公案”。朱陆间理学与心学两派之争,历史上学者对此评论不一,往往各执一偏,有崇朱抑陆或扬陆贬朱,然而也曾有学者能予以公允评论,指出朱陆之辩在学术史上的意义,清人章学诚说:“宋儒有朱陆,千古不可合之同异,亦千古不可异之同异。”②当代学者亦有专就朱陆之辩这个历史公案,作以全面深入的探
The Debates on Similarities and Differences between Zhu (Xi) and Lu (Jiuyuan) are a major public case in the history of Chinese philosophy, which has so far reached 800 years. Just as Chen Jian claimed in the Ming Dynasty, “The debate between Zhu and Lu has not been over for hundreds of years.” In the history of scholars, scholars often differ in their comments on the theories of Confucianism and Luxun and scholars from different schools of thought. Historically, scholars have been divided into two categories. Some scholars hold the view that “ Lu debate in the academic history of the meaning of Qing Zhang Zhisheng said: ”Confucianism with Lu Zhu, eras can not be the same, but also the eternal differences of the same." ② contemporary scholars also have special debate on Zhu Lu This historical case, for a comprehensive and in-depth exploration