论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨和观察左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统辅助宫腔镜子宫内膜息肉切除术对子宫内膜息肉的治疗效果。方法:随机选择我院2015年6月至2016年6月使用宫腔镜进行子宫内膜息肉切除手术的117例患者为研究对象,将其随机分成对照组和观察组,其中对照组58例,观察组59例。对照组患者在使用宫腔镜进行子宫内膜息肉切除手术后加以服用去氧孕烯炔雌醇片,观察组患者采用左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统辅助宫腔镜进行子宫内膜息肉切除手术(在手术后,置入一枚曼月乐环)。比较两组患者的临床治疗效果。结果:观察组患者的治疗效果明显高于对照组患者,同时,观察组患者的子宫内膜厚度明显较对照组更薄,数据差异显著,P<0.05,具有统计学意义。结论:观察组患者的治疗效果明显高于对照组患者,同时,观察组患者的子宫内膜厚度明显较对照组更薄,数据差异显著,P<0.05,具有统计学意义。
Objective: To investigate and observe the effect of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system assisted hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy on the treatment of endometrial polyps. Methods: A total of 117 patients with endometrial polyp resection using hysteroscopy were randomly selected from June 2015 to June 2016 in our hospital. The patients were randomly divided into control group and observation group, of which 58 cases in control group, Observation group of 59 cases. Control group of patients in the use of hysteroscopic resection of endometrial polyps to be taken after desogestrel ethinyl estradiol tablets, the observation group patients with levonorgestrel intrauterine release system assisted hysteroscopy for endometrial polyps Surgery (after surgery, into a Mirena ring). The clinical effects of the two groups were compared. Results: The therapeutic effect of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group. At the same time, the endometrial thickness of the observation group was significantly thinner than that of the control group. The difference was significant (P <0.05), with statistical significance. Conclusion: The treatment effect of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group. At the same time, the endometrial thickness of the observation group was significantly thinner than that of the control group, with significant difference (P <0.05).