论文部分内容阅读
这里,我们将介绍1979年美国首都华盛顿地区主要城市统计区各医院实行呼吸疗法的调查结果,特别着眼于间歇性正压呼吸疗法的应用和那些潜在的、能取代间歇性正压疗法的方式。关于提供不同类型呼吸疗法所需时间,付给从事该工作人员的工资,以及设备成本,我们都根据特定类型的治疗对其相对成本作了估计;同时,还比较了以一种治疗方式代替另种治疗方式之间相对成本的差异;最后,在调查中,又把估计的相对成本与医院的实际费用作了比较。此分析支持这种结论,即当与间歇性正压呼吸疗法相比较时,我们从另几种疗法中任选一种,其相对成本可能低些。
Here, we will present the survey results of respiratory therapy conducted in various hospitals in the major cities of the Washington area in the United States in 1979, with a particular focus on the use of intermittent positive pressure respiratory therapy and those potential alternatives to intermittent positive pressure therapy. Regarding the time required to provide different types of respiratory therapies, the wages paid to the staff, and the cost of equipment, we have estimated the relative costs of certain types of treatment; at the same time, we have compared the use of one treatment method to another. The differences in the relative costs of the treatments; Finally, in the survey, the estimated relative costs were compared with the actual costs of the hospital. This analysis supports the conclusion that, when compared to intermittent positive pressure respiratory therapy, we choose from one of several other therapies and the relative cost may be lower.