论文部分内容阅读
据报道,为确保节日期间社会秩序稳定,某市检察机关快审快诉,日前将228件侵犯公民人身权、财产权案件和其他“严打”案件的290名被告人集中向法院提起公诉。这种“集中公诉”是出于良好目的,为的是震慑犯罪,以能使公众在安定祥和环境中度过节日。但实事求是地分析,会发现这种“集中公诉”并不一定与法制精神相符。对于那些到达要么公诉要么释放临界点的犯罪嫌疑人,如果为了等到节日前“集中公诉”而不予及时起诉,就可能造成事实上的超期羁押。而对于那些关押时日不多者,如果为着让他们赶上“集中公诉”这趟车,也就存在着对犯罪性质与证据等审查不严的可能。超期羁押侵犯嫌疑人的法定权利,而审查不严可能导致办案差错。而且既有“集中
It has been reported that in order to ensure social stability during the holiday season, the procuratorial organs of cities soon proceeded to petition the courts and filed a total of 228 prosecutions against 228 defendants infringing on citizens’ personal rights, property rights and other ”serious strike“ cases. Such ”centralized indictment“ is for good purposes in order to deter crime and enable the public to spend holidays in a stable and peaceful environment. However, if we analyze it in a pragmatic manner, we will find that such ”centralized indictment“ does not necessarily match the spirit of the legal system. For those suspects who arrive at either prosecutions or release critical points, de facto extended detention may result if they are not prosecuted in order to wait for the pre-holiday ”centralized indictment.“ But for those who are not in custody, if there is a possibility of censorship on the nature and evidence of criminality in order to allow them to catch up with the ”centralized indictment“. Extended custody violates the legal rights of the suspect, and the lack of censorship may lead to a wrong handling of the case. And both ”focus