论文部分内容阅读
目的研究评价溶栓治疗急性脑梗死的临床效果。方法 60例急性脑梗死患者,根据患者意愿分成对照组和观察组,每组30例。对照组仅采用常规药物治疗,观察组在此基础上加以溶栓治疗,对比观察两组的临床疗效及不良反应的发生情况。结果观察组的临床疗效较对照组好,不良反应较对照组少,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在治疗急性脑梗死的过程中,采用溶栓治疗方式,临床效果较佳,且对急性脑梗死患者来说,溶栓治疗和早期的诊断至关重要。
Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of thrombolytic therapy on acute cerebral infarction. Methods Sixty patients with acute cerebral infarction were divided into control group and observation group according to patients’ wishes, 30 cases in each group. The control group only treated with conventional drugs, the observation group was thrombolytic therapy on this basis, the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results The clinical curative effect of the observation group was better than that of the control group, and the adverse reaction was less than that of the control group. The differences were statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of acute cerebral infarction, thrombolytic therapy is adopted, and the clinical effect is better. For patients with acute cerebral infarction, thrombolytic therapy and early diagnosis are very important.