论文部分内容阅读
一今天上午,听了团队成员上的三堂课。执教者上的分别是《母鸡》《蒙娜丽莎之约》《秦兵马俑》。三堂课,加强语用,突出言语实践,从扎扎实实感知课文,字字推敲品味重点段,津津有味美读课文,到知识的迁移运用,语言的内化活用,应该是符合语文的特征的。但,三堂课的结尾,引起我的反思———《母鸡》教学的结尾:师:作者描写同一只母鸡,运用这么明显的对比,你觉得作者的用意是什么?(生:夸赞母鸡。)就像弹簧一样,压得越低,弹得越高。这其实是
One morning, I listened to three class members on the team. Coaches are the “hen” “Monalisa” “Qin Terracotta Warriors.” Three classes, to strengthen pragmatic, emphasize the practice of speech, from a solid sense of the text, the word emphasis on the taste of taste, taste relish the text, to the transfer of knowledge and use of language, internalization of the language should be consistent with the characteristics of the language . However, the end of the three lessons aroused my introspection --- the end of “hen” teaching: Teacher: the author describes the same hen, the use of such a clear contrast, do you think the author’s intention is what? Hen.) Just like a spring, the lower the pressure, the higher the spring. This is actually