论文部分内容阅读
讀过張如心的“毛澤东同志对馬克思主义唯物論的貢献”和“毛澤东同志对馬克思主义辯証法的貢献”兩書,一个較深的印象是:它們存在清教条主义的倾向。介紹或解釋經典著作的目的,虽然是要使人知道某些經典作家如何如何說,更重要的是在介紹和解释它时,应該把它和革命的实踐联系起来,使人理解这种說法的正确性,使人知道怎样运用它指导其行动。反过来說,如果介紹和解釋經典著作时,不联系实际,那末,也不可能把原著的精神实質介紹出來。这兩本書的缺点正在这里。
Having read Zhang Ruxin’s “Contributions of Mao Zedong to Marxist Materialism” and “Comrade Mao Tse-tung’s Contributions to Marxist Dialectics,” one of the deeper impressions is that they tended to be pro-dogmatic. The purpose of introducing or explaining the classics is to make one know how some classics write and what is more important is to introduce and explain it by linking it with revolutionary practice so that one understands this The correctness of the assertion tells people how to use it to guide their actions. Conversely, it is impossible to introduce the spiritual essence of the original without introducing reality when introducing and interpreting the classic. The shortcomings of these two books are here.