论文部分内容阅读
自从斯大林于1952年在《苏联社会主义经济问题》中第一次明确提出国民经济有计划按比例发展规律以来,我国经济理论界围绕这一规律进行了广泛的讨沦,提出了各种不同的看法,其中,争论的焦点是:国民经济有计划按比例发展是不是社会主义客观存在的经济规律?有些同志对这个问题持否定态度,否定的理由是多种多样的,归纳起来,主要有二种:一是,“有计划按比例规律的概念本身就不确切,按比例是客观经济发展的要求,而有计划是人为的,主观因素,不是客观经济规律。”(何伟:“论社会主义制度下的商品经济兼论企业的独立性问题”《经济学动态》1979年第3期)二是,“有计划按比例的发展规律,就是要有计划按比例分配生产资料和劳动力,这正是价值规律的调节作用已经解决了的问题。”所以,根本就没有必要提出有计划按比例发展规律。(卓炯:“价值规律与四个现代化” 《学术月刊》1979年第2期)我们认为,这些看法都是不能令人信服的。 一 先看第一种见解。马克思指出:“要想得到和各种不同的需
Since Stalin first proposed clearly in 1952 that “the socialist economy in the Soviet Union” clearly state that the national economy has a systematic and pro-rata law of development, our economic theorists have conducted extensive discussions on this law and put forward various different proposals However, the focus of the debate is whether the development of the national economy in a planned and proportionate manner is an economic law that is an objective reality of socialism. Some comrades hold a negative attitude toward this issue. There are many reasons for their rejection. To sum up, there are mainly two Kind of: First, “the concept of a planned pro-rata rule is inherently imprecise, and the pro-rata objective is the requirement of objective economic development, and the plan is man-made and subjective, not an objective economic law.” Commodity economy under the doctrine system and on the issue of the independence of enterprises. “Economic Dynamics, 1979, No.3) Second,” With the law of development in a planned and pro-rata manner, there is a plan to allocate the means of production and the labor force in a pro-rata manner. It is the problem that the adjustment of the law of value has solved. “Therefore, it is not necessary at all to propose a plan to develop the law pro rata. (Zhuo Jiong, ”The Law of Value and the Four Modernizations“, ”Academic Monthly, 1979, No. 2, 1979) We do not think these views are convincing. First look at the first opinion. Marx pointed out: "To get and all kinds of different needs