论文部分内容阅读
本文从诗人、散文家蒋蓝2007年出版即引起批评界较大反响的《思想存档》入手,分析了当代人文思想的个人化表述困境。正如学院研究“文学”其实研究的是“文学性”一样,最具切入度的思想,往往只能来自鲜活个体的生命思索。在这个意义上,诗人与思想者既具亲和力,又因理性和智性的思维方式的倚重而充满悖论。作者认为,蒋蓝以诗性话语言说思想的方式,不但使其文体具有一种“打通”壁垒的风锐度,而且在很大程度上让诗性话语成为了思想与诗性“对创生成”的富矿,从而使海德格尔的“语言是存在的家”得到了现实性的“在场”和落成。
This article begins with the “Thought Archive” published by the poet and essayist Jiang Lan in 2007, which caused great criticism from critics. It analyzes the dilemma of individualization of contemporary humanistic thoughts. Just as college studies “literature ” actually studies “literary ” as the most cutting-edge thinking, often can only come from life thinking fresh individuals. In this sense, the poet and the thinker have both affinity and are full of paradoxes due to the reliance on rational and intellectual ways of thinking. The author thinks that Jiang Lan’s way of thinking in his poetic language not only makes his stylistics have the sharpness of a kind of “break through” barrier, but also makes the poetic discourse to a great extent become the thought and poetic “Generating Genesis”, so that Heidegger’s “language is the existence of ” has been the reality “presence ” and completed.