论文部分内容阅读
对党委办公室系统督查工作进行考核评比,有利于增强督查工作的活力,激发督查人员的积极性和创造性,提高工作效率.但由于目前督查工作考评在理论上缺乏一套科学的、系统的标准,致使各地的考评工作没有硬性的尺度可遵循,直接影响了考评结果的客观性.根据几年来的工作实践,我们认为衡量督查工作的优劣,应重点遵循以下标准:一、督查主体的权威性所谓权威,是指使人信从的力量和威望.督查主体的权威性,是指领导机关或督查机构和人员,对执行部门有没有较强的约束力,执行部门能不能自觉承办、落实督查者交办的各项任务.之所以把督查主体的权威性列为考评标准是因为:其一,督
Examination and appraisal of the system supervision work of Party committees and offices is conducive to enhancing the vitality of supervision work, arousing the enthusiasm and creativity of inspectors and improving work efficiency, but due to the lack of a set of scientific and systematic theories Of the standards, resulting in the assessment of all parts of the work there is no hard standard to follow, a direct impact on the objectivity of evaluation results.According to the work practice over the years, we believe that the strengths and weaknesses of the supervision work should focus on following the following criteria: To check the authority of the main body The so-called authority refers to the power and prestige that leads people to obey.Inspecting the authority of the main body refers to the leading organs or the supervisory organs and personnel, which have strong binding power to the executive departments and the executive departments Can not conscientiously undertake and implement the tasks assigned by the inspectors.The reason why the authority of the main body of the inspection as the evaluation criteria is because: First, the supervision