论文部分内容阅读
梁堂华老师在《中学政治教学参考》2005年7·8合刊上发表了“‘镜中花’‘水中月’是物质还是意识”一文(以下简称“镜”文),笔者拜读后受益匪浅。但对梁老师的某些观点,笔者不敢苟同,现提出来与大家共同探讨。“镜”文通过论述后得出这样的结论:“综上所述,我们应当可以这么说:‘镜中花’‘水中月’从形式上看是物质,从内容上看则是意识。”为了得出这样的结论,梁老师以“镜中花”为例,从内容和形式两个方面作了一番详细剖析。笔者对梁老师“形式”这个方面的论述完全赞同,但对其它论述发表一点不同的意见,不当之处敬请梁老师和同仁见谅。
Teacher Liang Tanghua published in the “School of Political Education Reference in Secondary School” 2005 7-8 joint publication of “’Mirror in flower’, ’Water in the moon’ is material or consciousness’” (hereinafter referred to as “mirror” in the text). After the benefit. However, the author did not dare to agree with some of the viewpoints of Mr. Liang and he proposed to discuss it with everyone. After the discussion, the “Mirror” text concluded that: “To sum up, we should be able to say: ’Mirror Flower’ ’Water Moon’ is material in terms of form, and from the content point of view, it is In order to come to this conclusion, Professor Liang took ”mirror in the mirror“ as an example, and made a detailed analysis of the content and form. The author fully agrees with the discussion of Liang’s ”forms" aspect, but expresses a bit different opinions on other topics. Improperly, I would like to ask Liang and colleagues to forgive me.