论文部分内容阅读
社会心理学家阿西(S.E.Asch)曾做过这样一个实验:他以大学生为被试者,每组7—9人,其中只有一人是真正的被试者,其余则是事先串通好的陪衬者。测验时,将陪衬者安排坐在前,被试者坐在后。然后,主试人拿出A、B两张卡片:A卡片上画有1条直线;B卡片上画有3条不同长度的直线,但有一条与A卡片中直线长度相同。这样的卡片共有12对。看完后,请大家逐个指出:画有3条线的B卡片上哪一条直线与A卡片上的直线相等。回答时,陪衬者按事先的约定,在B卡片上共同选出一条显然错误的直线。结果是真正的被试者竟有37％的人跟着多数的陪衬者作出错误判断。但在单个进行控制实验时,被试者中都几乎没人出现错误。后来,有人改进了阿西的方法,做了类似实验,结果基本相同。
Social psychologist SEAsch has done such an experiment: he took college students as subjects, each group of 7-9 people, of whom only one is the real subjects, the rest are good collusion in advance By. Quiz, will arrange to sit in front of the carrier, the subjects sat behind. Then, the main test person took A and B two cards: A card draws a straight line; B card draws three different length straight lines, but one has the same length as the A card straight line. There are 12 pairs of such cards. After reading, please point out one by one: draw a 3 line of the B card on a straight line which is equal to the line on the A card. When answering, the assailant, on prior agreement, chooses a clearly wrong line on the B card. As a result, as many as 37% of the true respondents make the wrong judgment with the majority of their dependents. However, in a single control experiment, almost none of the subjects in the error. Later, some people improved Assi’s method, did a similar experiment, the results are basically the same.