论文部分内容阅读
编辑同志: 读了贵刊今年第2期上的《关于句子运用的两个统计》一文,感到有不少迷惑之处,因而录下几条,请教于大方之家, 该文试图用统计的方法来研究文体和句型之间的关系,这想法不可谓不好。但是统计方法的使用,必须建立在科学的基础之上。如果对一些基本概念都不清楚,就着手进行统计,那么统计出来的数据就难以说明问题。甚而至于,由于用了统计的方法,会使一些不太懂行的人上当,以为数据可靠实用,造成思想上的混乱。举例来说,文章把所谓“功能句型”分为
Editor comrades: read your magazine on the second issue of this year’s “on the use of the sentence two statistics” article, I feel a lot of confusion, and thus recorded a few, consult the generous home, the article attempts to use statistics Method to study the relationship between style and sentence, this idea is not bad. However, the use of statistical methods must be based on science. If you do not understand some of the basic concepts, proceed with the statistics, then the statistics of the data difficult to explain the problem. Even as a result of the statistical method, some uninterested people will be fooled into thinking that the data are reliable and practical and cause ideological confusion. For example, the article divides the so-called “functional sentence pattern” into