论文部分内容阅读
公开课经常遭到观摩者的批判和质疑。理由是:公开课是被雕琢过度的“千层”课;表演作秀成分居多;可学可用的做法少之又少等等。不可否认,评判者是带着理性的思考进行品评。公开课真的就是“金玉其外,败絮其中”吗?这不禁让人想为公开课叫屈。公开课历来是教师观摩、学习、研讨的范本,我认为公开课功不可没。一、公开课为教师专业成长搭建了平台教师从初上讲台时的稚嫩懵懂到讲课时的娴熟
Open classes are often criticized and challenged by observers. The reason is: open class is carved over “Melaleuca ” class; show the composition of the show the most; learn to use few and so on. It is undeniable that judges judge with rational thinking. Open class really is “golden addition, defeat one ” it? This can not help but want to openly complain. Open class has always been a teacher observing, learning, research model, I think open class contributed. First, the open class for the professional growth of teachers to build a platform for teachers from the beginning of the stage when the infamous ignorant of the lecture skill