论文部分内容阅读
七月间的教改摆脱不了旧框框 1958年7月间我系修订红专规划时,曾经提出:要“糾正数学不能直接为生产服务的錯誤观点,主动尋找为生产服务的門路”。但生产中有无教学問題?即使有了,学数学的人能否解决?有无必要去解决?很多教师对此是有怀疑的。积极拥护这个方针的同志也因过去从没有搞过,而不是那么“胸有成竹”。也正因为这一环沒有突破,当时进行的教学改革工作(如修訂教学計划等)是很不彻底的,基本上是停留在学时的增减上,即使精简了某些課程,也仍然摆脱不了旧框框。有同志反映那时的教学計划是改良主义的。这不无道理。
The Education Reform in July Cannot Get Rid of the Old Frame In July 1958, when my department revised the plan for the Red Mansion, it was proposed that “correcting mathematics cannot directly take the wrong view of production and service, and actively look for the way to serve production”. However, if there is any teaching problem in production, even if there is, can anyone who studies mathematics solve it? Is it necessary to solve it? Many teachers are skeptical. The comrades who actively advocated this policy have never been engaged in the past and are not so “briefy.” It is precisely because this loop has not broken through. The teaching reforms (such as revision of the teaching plan, etc.) conducted at that time were incomplete. They basically remained on the increase or decrease in the number of hours. Even if some courses were streamlined, they still could not get rid of it. Old frame. There are comrades who reflect that the teaching plan at that time was reformist. This is not without reason.