论文部分内容阅读
我們党的报刊有光輝的历史传統。40年来,党报工作积累了丰富的,有些是独特的經驗,这是我們的宝貴的財富。应該学习和继承党报的传統,是从來也沒有发生过疑問的。至于应該怎样对待資产阶級报刊的历史传統呢?这问题就复杂得多了。資产阶級报刊和无产阶級报刊性质根本不同。因此,两种传統也根本不同,这是不应含糊的。但是,如果因此便认为二者之間并无批判地继承的关系,那却也不然。问题是怎样认識这种传統,怎样对待这个領域中的继承問题。这篇文章想就这个問題試提出一些初步意見,希望得到批評和指正。
Our party’s newspapers and magazines have a glorious historical tradition. Over the past 40 years, the party newspaper has accumulated a wealth of work, some are unique experiences, this is our precious wealth. There should never be any doubt that the tradition of the party newspaper should be studied and inherited. The question of what to do with the historical tradition of the bourgeois press is much more complicated. The nature of bourgeois press and proletarian press is fundamentally different. Therefore, the two traditions are fundamentally different, which should not be ambiguous. However, it is not so if it is assumed that there is no critical inheritance between the two. The question is how to understand this tradition and how to treat the succession issue in this field. This article attempts to put forward some preliminary opinions on this issue and hopes to be criticized and corrected.