论文部分内容阅读
80年代“变脸”后的文学批评,对新中国前三十年文学的正面价值似有难言之隐,多以“反读”代替正读、“发现”代替判断、阐释代替评价。个中原由,除历史本身的某些负面效应,批评方法的缺失也值得反思。借助韦勒克文学理论的反历史主义立场及其“透视主义”观点,批评似可得到拓展。在“透视主义”的视野下,文本内部呈现方式出现了新的可能性,并可带来外部意义关联的另一种可理解性。
The literary criticism after the “face-changing” of the 1980s seems unspeakable to the positive value of the literature in the first three decades of New China, with “reading” instead of positive reading and “finding” instead of judgment. . In a word, in addition to some negative effects of history itself, the absence of criticism is worth reflecting on. With the anti-historicist standpoint of Wellek’s literary theory and its “perspective” perspective, criticism seems to be extended. Under the perspective of “Perspectiveism ”, there is a new possibility of internal presentation of texts and another intelligibility of the external meanings.