论文部分内容阅读
在本人所写的哈贝马斯传记中,我提出的两个问题:我用生存范畴去讨论他的理论与他力图恢复事实和规范的公共性的努力是相容的吗?我能把世俗地解读的“记忆式团结”(anamnestic solidarity)②概念赋予哈贝马斯,并以此去把握本雅明一克尔凯郭尔式的历史开放性吗?最好的答案是重印哈贝马斯在京都的令人惊异的生平自述(即他在2004年11月11日获京都奖(Kyoto Award)典礼上的答谢演讲)。其次是先把问题放到具体情境之中,然后根据哈贝马斯的自述来回答这两个问题。
In my own biography of Habermas, I asked two questions that I raised: Is it compatible with my endeavor to discuss his theory with his endeavor to restore the publicity of facts and norms? Interpretation of “anamnestic solidarity” ② conception gives Habermas and in this way to grasp the historical openness of Benjamin-Kierkegaard? The best answer is to reprint Haber Masi’s amazing life in Kyoto recounts (ie, his grateful speech at the Kyoto Award ceremony on November 11, 2004). The second is to first put the issue into context and then answer both questions based on Habermas’s self-report.