浅谈死刑核准权收归最高人民法院后的程序完善问题

• 作 者: 左宁
• 机 构: 华东政法大学 上海200042
• 出 处: 吉林公安高等专科学校学报
• 发表日期: 2007年04期
• 关键词: 死刑复核程序 不足 程序完善 Death penalty review procedures disadvantage procedure improvem

死刑核准权已经收归了最高人民法院,这种经历了辩证否定的权力回归是法治的胜利。但是随着相关司法解释的出台与施行,最高人民法院复核死刑的程序还存在一些纰漏和不足,如审理方式问题、对被告人进行讯问的问题、人民检察院及被害人是否应当参与的问题、辩护权问题、证明标准问题等仍然需要进一步地探讨和完善。

The death penalty has been authorized by the Supreme People’s Court. This return to a dialectical negation is the victory of the rule of law. However, with the introduction and implementation of relevant judicial interpretations, there are still some flaws and deficiencies in the Supreme People’s Court review of the death penalty procedures, such as the mode of hearing, the questioning of defendants, whether the people’s procuratorate and the victim should be involved, the issue of the right of defense , To prove the standard issues still need to be further explored and improved.