论文部分内容阅读
程朱的“理一分殊”说在张栽《西铭》的解释史上占据主流地位。在宋代“礼学理学化”的思想氛围中,这种解释过分强调其中包含的理学意味,而忽视了张载更为突出的礼学家身份。从“亲亲尊尊”的儒家礼秩原则重新审视《西铭》,不难发现张载在其中想象性构建的儒家宗法共同体,包含着他试图以“亲亲之仁”松动宋代君权独尊的“尊尊之义”的思想努力。重新讨论《西铭》的这种礼学意义,不仅可以勾连明清学者复兴礼学的实践在宋代的思想史线索,而且由此可以在更大意义上为重省宋代思想史提供一种参考性的反思视点。
Cheng Zhu’s “Li Yi Shu Shu” said that Zhang Zai “Xi Ming” in the history of interpretation of the dominant position. In the thought atmosphere of Confucianism and Confucianism in Song Dynasty, this kind of explanation overemphasizes the rational meaning contained in it, while ignoring the more prominent etiquette status of etiquette. It is not hard to find that the Confucian patriarchal clan community constructed by Zhang Zai in his “Ruling Respect for Confucianism” principle re-examines “Ximing Ming”, which contains his attempt to loosen his “benevolence” Solemn monarchy of the Song Dynasty “The sense of respect ” thinking hard. Re-discussing the significance of this ritual meaning of “Ximing” can not only connect with the clues of the thought of revival ritual in Ming and Qing dynasties during the Song Dynasty, but also provide a reference for re-thinking the history of Song Dynasty in a greater sense Sexual reflexive point of view.